Home
About
Practice Areas
Mediation / ADR
Certified Specialist
Our Clients
Decisions
Associations
Referrals
FAQ
 
Contact Us
Toronto, Mark H. Arnold certified specialist (civil litigation)
 
Decisions / Publications
   
 
 

Decisions / Publications

  • R v Johnson (1984), 61 N.S.R. (2d) 357 (C.A.)  (criminal appeal)
  • Henley v Atlantic Provinces Special Education Authority (1986), 71 N.S.R. (2d) 256 (T.D.); 72 N.S.R. (2d) 399 (A.D.); S.C.C. leave denied  (jurisdiction , employment law)
  • Stead v Smith (1986), 73 N.S.R. (2d) 82 (T.D.) (civil procedure)
  • Coakley v City of Halifax (1986), 73 N.S.R. (2d) 331 (T.D.)  (personal injury trial)
  • Lindsay v Stirling(1986), 76 N.S.R. (2d) 208 (T.D.) (certiorari, licensing)
  • Arnold et al v Attorney General of Ontario(1987), 61 O.R. (2d) 481 (H.C.J.) (constitutional rights, voting)
  • Pizza Pizza Ltd. v Satellite City Holdings Ltd. et al (1988), 50 R.P.R. 174 (H.C.J) (contract, commercial litigation)
  • Homelife Romano Realty Limited v Ciulla, [1988] O.J. 2052 (H.C.J.)(real estate commissions)
  • Agristor Credit Corp. Canada Ltd. v Rader et al (1989) 68 O.R. (2d) 281 (H.C.J.) (civil procedure, rule 34.04, 34.07)
  • Lewis A. Jones Inc. v Grandma Lee's of Canada Ltd. (1989), 71 O.R. (2d) 187 (C.A.) (franchise dispute)
  • Metro. Toronto Condo Corp. No. 706 v Bardmore Developments et al (1991), 3 O.R. (3d) 278 (C.A.) (civil procedure, rule 19.03)
  • Metro. Toronto Condo Corp. No. 949 v Irvine (1992), 24 R.P.R. (2d) 140 (Ont. Gen. Div.) (condominium law, tenants rights)
  • Peel Condo Corp. No. 417 v Tedley Homes Ltd. (1993), 32 R.P.R. (2d) 211 (Ont. Gen. Div.)   35 O.R. (3d) 257 (C.A.) (condominium law, unconscionable contract, common elements)
  • York Condo Corp No. 275 v Mueller Ont., [1991] O.J. No. 03335/90 (Gen.Div.) (condominium law, owners duties)
  • Metro Toronto Condo Corp. No. 706 v Hinds, [1991] O.J. 2031 (Gen.Div.) (condominium/tenant law)
  • Horizon Holidays of Canada v Commercial Union Assurance Company of Canada, et al, [1992] O.J. 2830 (Gen.Div.) (real property, mortgages, motion for judgment)
  • Capadoccia Estate v Ricci et al, [1992] O.J. 2597 (Gen.Div.) (estate litigation)
  • Knights v Mitchell, [1992] O.J. 2122 (Gen.Div.) (civil procedure, rule 36.04)
  • Nortown Refrigeration Limited v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [1992] O.J. 1537 (Gen.Div.) (motion for judgment)
  • Han v ReMax Town & Country Realty Ltd. et al, [1992] O.J. 1197 (Gen.Div.) (real estate commissions, breach of trust)
  • Macey Neon v Bid Construction Inc. ,[1992] O.J. No. 1251 (Gen.Div.) (trial, breach of contract)
  • Langin v Rosehall Management Inc, [1993] O.J. No. 3495 (CA) (court of appeal, contract interpretation)
  • Anderson v Sandiford, [1994] O.J. No. 756 (Gen.Div.) ( application re: contractual interpretation)
  • Fiske v Hartford Insurance Company of Canada et al, [1994] I.L.R. 2607 (Gen. Div.) (insurance law, damages to goods in transit)
  • Zanny Ltd. v Vero-Kim Developments Inc. (1994) , 5 W.D.C.P. (2d) 227 (Gen.Div.)  (SCJ)(Interest Act. S.4)
  • Pelican v Karpiel (1994), 20 O.R. (3d) 659 (C.A.). (constructive trust)
  • McNeil Electronics v American Sensors Electronic Inc., [1996] O.J. No. 3446, [1998] O.J. No. 345(C.A.) ( case management rules and default judgment)
  • Stockey v Peel Condominium Corporation No. 174 (1996), 30 O.R. (3d) 446 (SCJ)( jurisdiction of small claims court and condominium declaration interpretation))
  • Re: Agents Equity Inc (1996), 30 O.R. (3d) 557 (SCJ)(Personal Property Security Act}
  • Bank of Montreal v Stern et al,[1997] O.J. No. 1107 (CA)( summary judgment appeal)
  • M.T.C.C. 979 v Ellis Don Construction Ltd.,[1979] O.J. No. 353,865 (SCJ)( motion for leave to examine non-party)
  • 738012 v Stern,[1997] O.J. No. 3324 (SCJ)(construction lien procedures)
  • 109155 Ontario Inc v Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 949,[1997] O.J. No. 3248 (SCJ)(proceeds of sale of a unit and principles of set-off)
  • Grossman Holdings Ltd. et al v  Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 75,[1998] O.J. Nos. 3147,3910 (SCJ), 3289 (CA) (summary judgment)
  • Nourhighighi v Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation No.935,[1998] O.J. No. 3049(C.A.)(enforcement of Condominium Act and Declaration)
  • Costeloe v Lee,[1998] O.J. No. 1924 (C.A.) (Rule 57.07 and personal obligation of solicitor)
  • Sterling v Ungerman,[1998] O.J. No. 596 (SCJ) (motion to remove solicitor for alleged conflict of interest)
  • Smith v Red Green III Productions Inc. [1999] O.J. No. 1704 (SCJ)(application for an oppression remedy)
  • Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters v  Ontario [1999] O.J. No. 4787 (SCJ) (Motion for intervenor status.)
  • Ontario Black Bear Association v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario [2000] O.J. No. 2289 (SCJ) (Motion to strike etc.)
  • Stitt v Ontario, [2001] O.J. No. 1337 (motion to strike pleadings)
  • Bouzari v Islamic Republic of Iran [2002] O.J. No. 1624 (SCJ), [2004] O.J. No. 2800 (CA) (international law claim for damages for torture)
  • Jacyszyn v Toronto [2001] O.J. No. 3961 (SCJ) (pension benefits in a contest between a lawful spouse and an alleged common law spouse)
  • Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1385 v Skyline Executive Properties, [2002] O.J. No. 5117( SCJ), [2003] O.J. No. 5116 (CA) (appointment of a Condominium Administrator and interpretation of a condominium declaration)
  • Brown v Slaby, [2002] O.J. No. 2518 (SCJ) (motion for leave to appeal to Divisional Court)
  • Ivandaeva Total Image Salon Inc. V Hlembizky (2003), 63 O.R. (3d) 769 (CA), (sealing orders and standing for notice that file to be sealed)
  • Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1385 v Izzard, [2003] O.J. No. 4230 (CA) (court imposed restriction on a condominium tenant)
  • Anthopoulos v LaPalme, [2003] O.J. No. 1600 (SCJ) (motion to amend pleadings to bring derivative relief); [2003] O.J. No.5452 (SCJ) (trial of an oppression remedy)
  • Konop v Brazilian Canadian Coffee Co, [2004] O.J. No. 2784 (SCJ) (wrongful dismissal trial and oppression remedy)
  • Kymbo v Teskey, [2004] O.J. No. 2414 (SCJ) (motion for fresh evidence)
  • Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 78 v Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 50 etal.,  [2006] O.K. No. 605. (Appeal of an arbitration award under Sec. 45 and 46 of the Arbitration Act.)
 
   
 
   
 
GMA Law Toronto
Privacy & Disclaimer Statements  
Copyright Mark H. Arnold 2007
  Contact Us